United States: Blame it or not, Trump is a mess


The attack on the Capitol is believed to be a “conspiracy” led by the defeated president and his lawyer, John Eastman. Now a question arises: should federal prosecutors blame Donald Trump?

Donald Trump at the Save America Rally with former US President Donald Trump in Menton, Illinois on June 25, 2022.

Donald Trump at the Save America Rally with former US President Donald Trump in Menton, Illinois on June 25, 2022.

Getty Images via AFP

The chilling picture of the president who knew he had lost the election, but was still trying Stick to powerDrawing on the avalanche of testimony brought in recent days in the US Congress by Republican figures.

White House or Donald Trump campaign staff, lawyers and even his family members have drawn the outlines of potential lawsuits, highlighting the many potential mistakes the billionaire made during his presidency, culminating in the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol. .

The file, compiled by selected officials of the commission investigating the attack, aims to prove that the incident was part of a broader attempt at a “conspiracy” led by the defeated president and his lawyer, John Eastman. Now an important question arises: should federal prosecutors charge Donald Trump?

“Mr. Trump is likely to be indicted by the judiciary,” former New York federal attorney Kevin O’Brien told AFP. “The legal case is strong and will appear compelling to a jury. Lawyers can combine Trump and John Eastman’s plans with the insurgency to thwart the election vote count. Capital on the other hand,” he analyzes.

The parliamentary committee has always said that it leaves the question of the indictment to the relevant authorities. But he acknowledged that there were at least two crimes against Donald Trump: preventing voters from counting votes and participating in a criminal organization against the United States. The established facts are not exactly in favor of the former reality TV star.

“Obvious Danger”

Before the violence in Washington, Donald Trump convinced his supporters that the election had been stolen from him. He encouraged them to go to the federal capital on January 6th. He harassed thousands of people there that day and told elected officials to go to the Capitol, a few hundred meters away, when they could certify the election results.

The parliamentary inquiry also highlighted the threats of assessors.

According to his supporters, Donald Trump firmly believed that there was election fraud and tried in good faith to protect the electorate. But the 76-year-old chancellor was well aware of what he had lost, considering what his close advisers had repeatedly said. Retired Judge J., who is considered a star in conservative circles. One of the strongest testimonies of Michael Luttick. He said Donald Trump presented a “clear and current danger” to American democracy.

Despite the widespread consensus that he could be justifiably prosecuted outside the billionaire’s supporters, the question for Justice Minister Merrick Garland is whether he should be.

“Above the law”

Edward Loose, a Washington-based Financial Times columnist, said, “A bad case can strengthen Trump and even help re-elect him. When you attack a king, you have to put him down, even the former king.”

Merrick Garland can expect strong public support if he decides to blame Donald Trump: According to a new ABC News poll -Ipsos, nearly 60% of Americans believe the former president should face trial. But for Nema Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor from San Diego (California), the Minister of Justice did not have the “courage” to start this fight. “The indictment of the former president is unprecedented and it will take an aggressive lawyer who is ready to deal with a difficult and politically charged case,” he told the AFP. “I don’t think Merrick Garland is that lawyer.”

According to Nicholas Greel, a law professor at Georgia College and State University, Donald Trump’s concern is an insult to one of the fundamental principles of American justice: “No man is above the law.” “One indictment violates established rules that ex-presidents should not be prosecuted and will certainly provoke a major uprising among his supporters,” he told the AFP. “But the alternative is to allow him to engage in a coup attempt, without any consequences.”


See also  Sri Lanka: President humiliated at Colombo airport

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.