X ignored ESAFETY orders to delete some posts related to priests in Australia – BT Beartai.

There is no power! While adhering to the principles of freedom of expression or opinion on the X platform, which frequently features stories on the media page, X said last Saturday, April 20, that it would ignore an order issued by the Australian regulator eSafety until the matter is heard in court. The Sydney NSW order said on Monday the boy was arrested by a crowd of people at the scene. He shouted, accusing the priest of insulting Islam. As of last Thursday, the police had charged the boy with terrorism.

X's global government affairs account posted that the Australian Cyber ​​Safety Commissioner had ordered X to remove certain Australian posts expressing public opinion. Regarding recent attacks on Christian pastors, these posts do not violate X's rules regarding violent speech. We believe that such orders do not fall within the scope of Australian law and X will abide by them while the matter is pending.

eSafety has informed Company X that these posts have been suspended globally. Otherwise, they will be fined A$785,000 per day. He will fight hard in court As for the electronic safety aspect, they gave an interview that “we are examining whether it is necessary to take any further action.”

eSafety is a regulatory agency of the Australian Government. Which removes harmful content online. Last March, the agency sent letters to social media companies, including YouTube, to remove terrorist content.

Bishop Mar Mary Emmanuel is a priest in the Assyrian Church of Christ the Good Shepherd and has a global following on social media. Because he is a preacher who teaches from the contents of the Bible. To criticize homosexuality, Covid vaccines, Islam, and the election of Joe Biden as President of the United States. Who supports gay rights (against religious principles)

April 6, Elon Musk, owner of the X platform, challenges the decision to reject all restrictions by a Brazilian judge. Even if the company loses all its revenue in Brazil and has to close its local offices, it will do so. Claiming that the principle (freedom of expression) is more important than profit. But on Monday, media reports published a letter sent by X's lawyer to a Brazilian judge. Which means that X will comply with the Brazilian court orders in all respects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *