Fed official: “We need to be careful” about raising rates after bank failures

Potential fault lines emerged on Tuesday over whether the Federal Reserve should proceed with rate hikes next month as it weighs the fallout from banking sector stresses stemming from the collapse of two mid-sized banks last month.

Chicago Fed President Austin Goolsby said the central bank should proceed cautiously with any further rate hikes as it assesses the aftereffects of the bank’s failures during a speech on Tuesday. “In moments like these of financial stress, the right monetary approach requires caution and patience,” he said in a speech at the Economic Club of Chicago.

Mr. Goolsbee became president of the Chicago Fed in January and voted for quarter-point increases in the benchmark federal funds rate at both central bank meetings this year, most recently in March to a range of 4.75% to 5%. But his remarks, as well as those from Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Patrick Harker delivered later on Tuesday, did not include clear support for further increases.

Over the past year, the Fed has raised interest rates at the fastest pace since the early 1980s to tackle inflation, which jumped to a 40-year high last year. The Fed raises interest rates to fight inflation by slowing the economy through tightening financial conditions, such as higher borrowing costs, lower stock prices, and a stronger dollar, which curb demand.

Regulators stepped in aggressively to boost confidence in the banking system after a Silicon Valley bank run forced them to close the bank on March 10 and the second bank, Signature Bank, to close on March 12.

Mr Goolsbee said surveys of bank lending showed lenders were already tightening loan standards before the two banks failed last month. He said he would pay close attention to polls and other anecdotal data about borrowing conditions in determining how to set policy in the coming weeks.

“Given how widespread uncertainty is about where these financial headwinds are going, I think we need to be careful,” he said. “We should collect more data and be careful about raising interest rates too aggressively until we see how much of a job the headwinds are doing for us in bringing down inflation.”

Mr Goolsbee said he saw no tension between the Fed’s efforts to slow the economy to combat inflation and its efforts to maintain a strong and stable banking system. But he said financial stress, even without escalating into a full-blown crisis, could slow the economy by reducing the availability of loans and other credit to households and businesses.

“I don’t think … we should stop prioritizing fighting inflation,” he said, due to pressures in the financial system. “But we also have to recognize that this mix could hit some sectors or regions in a way that feels different than if monetary policy were to act on its own.”

Mr. Harker of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, who also voted to approve two rate hikes this year, also signaled more caution in determining whether further increases are warranted.

“Because the full impact of monetary policy actions can take up to 18 months to work its way through the economy, we will continue to look closely at the available data to determine what additional measures, if any, we may need to take,” he said in remarks at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. .

Separately, New York Federal Reserve Bank President John Williams said officials are watching credit and banking conditions closely, but said there are no indications yet that business or consumer spending has been severely affected by the change in lending standards.

Another key consideration is whether Fed officials “really see signs of this underlying inflation coming down,” Mr. Williams told Yahoo Finance.

Federal Reserve officials hold their next meeting in early May. Mr. Williams, a senior ally of Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, pointed to the average forecast of 18 officials on the interest rates presented at their meeting last month. Those showed, he said, that policymakers “may be expecting one more price increase.”

Mr Williams said last week’s report on employment in March showed demand for work remained strong, and inflation “remains very high”. He said a measure of service prices that excludes energy and housing costs, which officials believe captures underlying price pressures, “has not yet budged.”

Write to Nick Timiraos at [email protected]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *