Daniel Snyder, House Oversight Committee escalates tensions over hearing

Placeholder while loading article actions

Washington Leaders owner Daniel Snyder reiterated his refusal to participate in Wednesday’s congressional hearing on the team’s workplace via a letter from his attorney on Monday.

In the letter, Snyder did not close the door to speaking to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform about where the team operates, but made it clear that he would only do so if certain conditions were met.

The two-page letter from Attorney Karen Patton Seymour, representing Snyder, to Representative Carolyn B. country.” It also restates concerns about “basic notions of fairness and due process.”

In response, a commission spokesperson noted that the commission “was more than accommodating” in several respects, including allowing Snyder to testify remotely from France.

“The commission will not be deterred in its investigation into the reality of workplace misconduct by Washington’s leaders,” the spokesman said in a statement.

The document shows that Daniel Snyder may prevent the publication of details of the investigation under an agreement with the NFL

The exchange represents the latest barrage of correspondence between Snyder and the commission about whether, when, and under what circumstances, he will testify under oath about sexual harassment and protracted toxicity reported by dozens of former employees.

Roger Goodell, the NFL Commissioner, will testify In a remote Wednesday session.

In a six-page letter to Snyder’s attorney on Friday, Maloney wrote that You didn’t find any good reason why he couldn’t testify He urged him to reconsider, offering to share some information up front as “accommodation”. She set 9 a.m. Monday as a deadline for his response.

See also  2022 Stanley Cup Playoff 7 Saturday: Oilers join Hurricanes, Lightning with wins to move to second round

The NFL declined to comment Monday on Snyder’s latest rejection.

The commission began its investigation into the leaders’ workplace and the NFL responded in October. After eight months of fact-finding, the commission considers Snyder’s testimony necessary and believes it should be available.

If he refuses to do so voluntarily, Maloney can issue a subpoena to compel him to testify. The ongoing discussion about what facilities will and will not be provided represents an attempt to find a compromise less than a subpoena.

As a result of the investigation, Maloney last week introduced legislation to curb the abuse of non-disclosure agreements and non-swap agreements and create new employee protections in all workplaces.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.